Limitations for Bringing Old Court Accusations

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Two states created legislation windows opening up new time periods for childhood sexual abuse victims to seek civil court redress. California allowed these victims to file a case against their employer or abuser within one year regardless when the abuse occurred. Then, Delaware followed in 2007, this time giving people two years of leeway in bringing their accusations to civil court.

Moreover, New York state legislators are debating for a one-year statute this year. Other states are also mulling over similar measures.

These statutes of limitations for civil or criminal actions help avoid circumstances where testimonies rely on faded memories, documents have disappeared, or the evidence is incomplete. However, when high-profile abuse scandals (allegedly perpetrated by Catholic priests) occurred decades ago, a few states saw a particular need for “window laws” that could open the courts again temporarily and allow remedies of past grievances through civil actions only (not criminal prosecutions).

Supporters of these laws say that people who didn’t know or disclose that they’ve been harmed will benefit the most. But others say that such laws may inevitably raise questions of fairness and constitutionality.

Some defense attorneys say that the only reason these cases are brought up is to wrench money from the church, since many of the named perpetrators are already retired or dead, and it’s almost impossible to defend these cases.

Tags: California, child abuse, Criminal, defense attorneys, Delaware, legislation, statutes of limitations
Posted in Criminal, Criminal News, Sexual Harassment | No Comments »